Peptide Policy Watch

Evidence

What kind of proof sits behind a claim: cell, animal, human trial or anecdote.

3 posts

Empty clear glass flasks, a beaker and a rack of empty test tubes on a pale bench beside a window.

"Studies show" can mean anything from cells in a dish to a randomized trial in people. This hub explains the ladder of evidence so you can tell which rung a claim is standing on.

FDA describes drug development as lab and animal work first, then human trials in phases. Even drugs that reach human trials mostly do not reach approval: FDA's page puts the share moving on at about 70% from Phase 1, about 33% from Phase 2 and about 25 to 30% from Phase 3. [V] Those are general figures, not a forecast for any peptide. In the 2025 BPC-157 review, 35 of 36 studies were preclinical, and its authors wrote that "No clinical safety data were found." A review published online October 8, 2026 counted three human studies and rated the overall certainty of evidence "very low." The counts differ because the reviews searched different dates and used different rules. [V] Personal accounts and social posts sit on the lowest rung: they record what one person reports, not what a controlled study measured.

Evidence labels: [V] verified in a primary document, [S] secondary source. Reviewed October 25, 2026.

Posts in this topic

Key terms in plain English

Preclinical
Lab and animal research done before studies in people. FDA's "Step 2" of drug development. [V]
Clinical trial phases
Human studies. Per FDA, they move from small safety-focused studies to larger ones that look at effectiveness and side effects. [V]
Randomized controlled trial
A study that assigns people to groups by chance and compares the groups.
Systematic review
A review that searches databases by a set method and counts the studies that meet stated criteria.

Primary sources behind this page

Other topics

Back to the home page

Image: AI-generated. Image credits